Watchdog clears Brittany Higginsâ $2.4m payout


The corruption watchdog has released its verdict on Brittany Higgins' payout. Photo: AAP
The National Anti-Corruption Commission says there was no corrupt conduct in the $2.4 million compensation payout to Brittany Higgins after her alleged rape in Parliament House.
In a statement on Thursday, the commission said it had analysed thousands of documents related to the 2022 Commonwealth settlement in a preliminary investigation.
It found there was no evidence that the process â or the amount â was subject to any âimproper influence by any Commonwealth public officialâ.Â
âTo the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government,â the NACC said.
âThere is therefore no corruption issue.â
The commission also said the compensation paid to Higgins was âless than the maximum amount recommended by the external independent legal adviceâ.
The settlement was referred to the national anti-corruption body by Higginsâ former boss, Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds, who questioned the handling of the process by then-attorney-general Mark Dreyfus. Former opposition leader Peter Dutton was among others to question the speed of the compensation process and the amount paid.
Former Liberal staffer Higgins alleged she was raped by senior colleague Bruce Lehrmann in Reynoldsâ Parliament House office in 2019. Charges were brought against Lehrmann in a criminal trial in 2022, but abandoned after juror misconduct. He has always denied the allegations.
The compensation settlement reached between the Commonwealth and Higgins was revealed during Lehrmannâs defamation case against Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson over their reporting of the assault allegation.
It took into account factors such as Higginsâ loss of earnings capacity, and her âhurt, distress and humiliationâ.
In its statement, the National Anti-Corruption Commission said the documents it had examined showed decisions relating to the settlement were based on advice from independent external solicitors and experienced counsel.Â
It also found there was no âidentifiable differenceâ in approach to the matter before and after the change in government following the May 2022 election.
âThat the mediation conference itself was concluded within a day is unexceptional,â it said.
âIt was the culmination of a process which took approximately 12 months. None of this is unusual for a non-litigated personal injury claim.
âA critical consideration during the settlement process was avoiding ongoing trauma to Ms Higgins.â
Reynolds, whom Higgins had claimed failed to support her adequately after her rape allegation, was excluded from attending mediation related to the settlement.
On Thursday, she said she was âbitterly disappointedâ the NACC would not investigate the payment further.
âMy primary concern has always been how the Commonwealth could possibly settle unsubstantiated and statute barred claims made against me, alleging egregious conduct on my part, without taking a single statement from me or speaking to me at all,â she said.
Reynolds said it was one of the issues her Federal Court lawsuit against the Commonwealth over the settlement would explore.
Dreyfus released a statement welcoming the commissionâs finding.
1800 RESPECT 1800 737 732
-with AAP








