The regulation of Australiaâs alcohol, gambling and food industries is being âcorruptedâ by a kind of nepotism that ushers former government ministers and staffers into powerful lobbying positions within the sectors they once oversaw.
Experts say itâs resulting in important legislation â some of which falls within public health and safety policies â being delayed for no good reason.
Analysis by the Sax Institute found that of the countryâs 560 lobbyists declared on the official record of lobbyists, more than one-third had been a government representative.
But thereâs no enforced legislations that mean people have to declare themselves as lobbyists (defined as a person who acts as an advocate with the aim of influencing government decisions to favour their cause).
This is one of the main loopholes the report, published on Wednesday in Public Health & Research, aims to close, senior report author Professor Peter Miller said.
The smooth transition from a government role to an industry lobbyist is known as the ârevolving doorâ, and itâs creating an imbalance through individualsâ sound networks, insider knowledge and networks, the report states.
Professor Miller, a psychology professor at Deakin University with an expertise in alcohol addiction and violence prevention, told The New Daily of an example of the revolving door in play: The director of liquor licensing went on to become a (former) head of the Australian Hoteliers Association.
ââŚThey have got this knowledge that theyâve gained (and) itâs also the networks where they can pick up the phone and call a minister,â Professor Miller said of staffers-turned-lobbyists.
âFor example, I was talking to the ministerâs office about drunks being allowed to play the pokies.
âHe was a senior adviser to the minister, and then the next time I spoke to the office I was told he now worked for Crown Casino.â
In Australia, there are regulations that dictate how long a person must be detached from working within the government, before they can strike up a position as a lobbyist.
That time frame stands at 18 months.
In the US and Canada, that time is five years.
The further problem with Australiaâs regulation is that itâs mostly unchecked, and when it is monitored, itâs monitored within parliamentary powers.
âItâs like the fox guarding the chicken coop,â Professor Miller said.
Revolving door keeps other doors shut
As part of the study compilation, the researchers interviewed former and serving politicians, staffers, journalists and advocates about their perceptions on industry influence on government policy.
A former politician explained the dominance of ex-politicians on an industryâs direction:Â âYou see former politicians popping up in these lobbying organisations, and the only reason theyâre employed is because they can wield influence.â
Professor Miller pointed directly to health warnings on alcohol labels as a public health reform that had been hampered by the revolving door cycle.
âThings like pregnancy warnings on alcohol labels: We know that we should be putting them up for 15 years,â Professor Miller told The New Daily.
âAll of the evidence for three years says alcohol causes cancer â we canât get the government to tell the public ⌠it wonât enforce things on the industry because of that revolving door.
âSport sponsorship in the alcohol industry â the public doesnât like it, so why are our politicians not acting? The answer is because the industry has this strong hold.â
An ex-political staffer who was interviewed for the study said: âThe politicians would go nuts [be strongly opposed to such measures] if it was felt that the regulator was going to suddenly do things that would be entirely consistent with reducing [alcohol-related] harm, but might reduce economic benefits of the [alcohol] industry itself. Youâd find pretty quickly that theyâd step in [to avoid changes to regulations].â
The food industry is also sucked into the pulling power of the revolving door â an example was the health star rating system, Professor Miller said.
âMilo has something like three stars, so do breakfast cereals that have more sugar than the chocolate that I buy,â he said.
âItâs an insane system and itâs obvious the government has been corrupted.â
Whatâs needed, the reportâs authors agree, is an overhaul of the regulations, which set clearer timeframes for cooling-off periods between government and lobbying roles, with consistent monitoring and enforced penalties.









