Advertisement

Wake in Fright: Misrepresented and maligned, this Australian classic is getting a new lease on life

It's not flattering, but maybe Australians aren't the villains in this cult classic.

It's not flattering, but maybe Australians aren't the villains in this cult classic. Photo: Umbrella Entertainment

With Umbrella Entertainment announcing the restoration of Aussie film classic Wake in Fright, it’s time to reflect on the gritty drama’s place in our cinema history.

Few Australian films have been more misrepresented by critics than Wake in Fright.

The 1971 movie was the first masterpiece of the revived Australian film industry – directed by a Canadian, from a script by a Jamaican, with a Norwegian producer, and finance from an American fridge manufacturer. It was based on a novel by Lakemba boy and part-time butterfly farm operator Kenneth Cook.

Umbrella Entertainment has announced a 4K restoration of the pioneering Australian ‘new wave’ movie. Scanned from the original camera negative then colour-corrected and stabilised one shot at a time, this new restoration has undergone months of work to clean all imperfections and distortion.

Umbrella’s restoration also marks the most recent entry into the muddied and strange history of this film. It has been called “a horror movie”, “probably the most unflattering depiction [of Australia] that has ever been filmed”, about a “descent into madness” and “unthinking savagery”, set in “a living hell” full of “sinister” characters.

Well, yes. But also, no.

Wake in Fright is not a horror film. It’s a gritty drama, I guess, about a school teacher, John Grant, assigned to work in a two-bit town in the Outback.

Grant is headed to Sydney on holiday when he loses all his money gambling in a wild-west type community (supposedly inspired by Broken Hill), gets invited to dinner, goes out ‘roo shooting and enjoys it but also doesn’t.

He stays with an alcoholic doctor, “Doc” Tydon, who, it’s implied, sexually assaults him. Grant has a nervous breakdown, tries to kill himself with a rifle, misses, then winds up back in his two-bit country town.

That doesn’t sound like much in synopsis form, but the brilliance of the novel (and film) lies in its evocation of outback life – the heat, flies, beer, cigarettes, two-up games, poker machines, red dirt, yellows, browns – and the people who live there – alcoholic, macho, lonely, boorish, bored, funny, friendly. Yes, friendly.

The thing often not appreciated about Wake in Fright is that most of the people Grant encounters are trying to be nice. They invite him to sing-alongs, shout him drinks when he’s broke, ask him over for dinner and to go ‘roo shooting, offer him sex, gifts, accommodation and free rides.

The only real predator is Doc, played by Donald Pleasance. I know viewers get upset by the drinking, shooting, gambling and fighting, but people did (and do) genuinely enjoy those things, along with the freedom and camaraderie of outback life. They don’t think they’re in hell.

Wake in Fright

Jack Thompson was memorable in one of his earliest roles. Photo: Umbrella Entertainment

Gary Bond, the actor who plays Grant in the film, was English, which suits the story perfectly since Grant basically acts like a self-important low-grade colonial official stuck out in a far-flung corner of the Empire.

He looks down on the natives as uncultured peasants, and maybe they are, but Grant’s the one who decides to play two-up, then to keep playing it.

He’s the one who almost gets run over by a car because he’s daydreaming, then gets drunk instead of looking for work. Who can’t get it up for a lonely woman, who agrees to go shooting and doesn’t seem to realise you can order a soft drink in a pub.

This snobbish Baby Boomer is too good for the people he encounters or things they do, but he doesn’t have the courage of his prejudices to avoid them. He can’t hold his booze, kill a kangaroo, get an erection, or say “no”.  He can’t even kill himself properly, or ask a clear question about what direction a truck is headed in.

But look, I also get it. I went to an all-boys’ GPS school, so I understand wanting to fit in among people you don’t necessarily like or even respect.

The novel and film are done with tremendous empathy and accuracy, which is the source of its power: It’s so identifiable and recognisable and true, and that makes it uneasy to watch.

There was movie interest in Cook’s novel almost immediately following its publication in 1961. I think it fitted in with British New Wave cinema of the time, with its verisimilitude, sexual frankness, toxic masculinity and class consciousness.

Also, the book is short and brilliantly written – you can “see” a film as you read it.

Morris West tried to get a big-screen version going, then Dirk Bogarde and Joseph Losey, before the money was raised by an Australian-American combination that included Bobby Limb. They were smart and lucky enough to hire as director Ted Kotcheff, who was Canadian, so he got it. (Canadians are basically Australians with snow and French).

Kotcheff had worked in Britain and was smart enough to respect the text. He had made a few features and so could handle a big production.

On release, Wake in Fright flopped at the box office everywhere, except a cinema in Paris. Perhaps it’s not hard to see why – the film doesn’t fit into any sort of easy-to-define genre and the public doesn’t generally go to serious stories about drunken louts unless you add gangsters and/or murder.

Also, there was no big name to draw the art house crowd (the Losey-Bogarde version couldn’t have been any better, but it might’ve made more money due to their fame).

In hindsight, though, the star power is obvious including Pleasance and Aussie icons Chips Rafferty, John Meillon and Jack Thompson in his first movie role.

Eventually Wake in Fight became a genuine cult favourite with passionate devotees, including TV presenter Bill Collins (a former school teacher), Nick Cave and Martin Scorsese (who went on to make a series of films about toxic male boors plus After Hours, which is clearly influenced structurally by Wake in Fright.)

The movie also has a surprising (to me, anyway) number of female fans – maybe they enjoy seeing men behaving badly in a way that’s so unglamorous.

Like I say, I think Wake in Fright is a masterpiece that’s been misrepresented, but the great thing about masterpieces is you can have different opinions on them. See the movie for yourself. You won’t regret it.

Umbrella Entertainment’s new 4K restoration of Wake in Fright premieres at the Melbourne International Film Festival in August and will be released for home entertainment later in 2024.

This article first appeared in InReview. Read the original here.

Advertisement
Stay informed, daily
A FREE subscription to The New Daily arrives every morning and evening.
The New Daily is a trusted source of national news and information and is provided free for all Australians. Read our editorial charter.
Copyright © 2024 The New Daily.
All rights reserved.