Advertisement

Madonna King: Damned if you do, damned if you don’t – Treasurer, his partner and her dress that upstaged the budget

Jim Chalmers and his wife Laura, wearing the dress, on budget night.

Jim Chalmers and his wife Laura, wearing the dress, on budget night. Photo: AAP

We are kidding ourselves if we think sexism is not the problem it was for our mothers, or that the gender equality gap – through affirmative action and the odd child care policy – is closing fast enough.

It is not. Whether it is bequests to boys’ schools, award nominations, influence in the workforce, or power in Parliament, women are still not at the starting line.

We follow – at a big distance – behind our male peers in almost every conceivable measure.

We pay more for haircuts and personal items, are more at risk of sexual harassment and feel heightened levels of safety concerns in isolated spots and after dark.

We earn less super, are becoming homeless at faster rates, and despite the narrative we are told, are rarely gifted the same opportunities.

Wearing thin

But perhaps the most stunning example is the treatment given to Laura Chalmers; a talented journalist who watched her husband Jim deliver the Albanese government’s budget.

Chalmers’ sin? She dared wear an off-the-rack Carla Zampatti dress, which from the published diatribe was ‘buttery’ in colour and carried a price tag – reportedly $1900 – that some found offensive.

The accusations against her – including that she was out of touch and had stolen the limelight from her husband – were witless, as was the commentary around where she was born, and how she planned her wedding.

Just imagine a male partner – let’s say a partner in an accounting firm – being the subject of a similar story, while his wife delivered the budget.

In fact, it stretches the imagination to picture a female treasurer …

But while we have discussed the story and the focus on Chalmers, what we have ignored post-budget is the level of blatant sexism this broadcasts and how we see a material difference in what a woman and a man can wear and what that means.

Jodie Haydon, Laura Chalmers and kids Leo and Annabel as Treasurer Jim Chalmers hands down the 2024-25 budget. Photo: AAP

Mind your business

For the record, Laura Chalmers has her own career, can defend herself, and is entitled to wear whatever she likes.

I have the same dress in a different colour, and know it can also be bought at sale.

Perhaps Chalmers borrowed it? Or saved her pennies because this was a historic and special night for her family?

It does not matter and it is none of our business.

Male order

So why haven’t we turned the attention on the meaning behind what a male wears?

In the absence of too many men playing the role of partner to a treasurer, let’s look at our male politicians. How often is their dress the subject of ridicule or claims of outrageous expense?

Perhaps in passing, Paul Keating copped a jibe. But that was decades ago. Fashion in our males, whatever the price tag, is applauded.

Whole forests have been printed on the French fashion of Emmanuel Macron, or the style of Spanish president Pedro Sanchez or Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo.

Canada’s Justin Trudeau’s socks have their own following, with photographic effort daily directed at how they routinely match his tie.

But the sexism that oozes from the case involving Laura Chalmers runs beyond claims that an expensive dress was incompatible with a national budget.

Dressing down

A woman is damned if she does and damned if she doesn’t.

Imagine if she’d turned up in sandshoes. It would have been disrespectful, or drawing attention to herself.

Imagine if she’d lobbed into the gallery, children in tow, and wearing a John Howard-style green and gold tracksuit? Would the commentary be using another term directed often directed at women – ‘letting herself go’?

Cheap shots are easy.

But we do a real disservice to ourselves to dismiss this episode so quickly.

This is a telling example of a woman being put down and criticised simply on the basis of dress. And that runs counter to all the claims that affirmative action is mending an appalling equality gap.

The proof of that, perhaps, is in the question you will never hear asked at a press conference by the treasurer, or prime minister, or any number of male ministers.

How much was that suit? Did you have it custom made? And would you describe your tie as buttery yellow or a soft lemon?

Just imagine Laura’s husband Jim copping that question.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Stay informed, daily
A FREE subscription to The New Daily arrives every morning and evening.
The New Daily is a trusted source of national news and information and is provided free for all Australians. Read our editorial charter
Copyright © 2024 The New Daily.
All rights reserved.