MacGill’s credibility attacked in bail application

Stuart MacGill has been charged over the supply of a commercial quantity of cocaine that led to his purported kidnapping.

Stuart MacGill has been charged over the supply of a commercial quantity of cocaine that led to his purported kidnapping. Photo: AAP

Stuart MacGill’s credibility has been attacked as the former Test cricketer’s de facto brother-in-law and alleged kidnapper made a bid to be released on bail.

Four men are facing charges after the 50-year-old retired spin bowler was allegedly forced into a car, taken to a remote location, beaten and then dumped in Sydney’s west in April.

But Mr MacGill’s account seemed to include exaggerations and inconsistencies, including about the use of a gun and the extent of facial injuries suffered, a lawyer for Marino Sotiropoulos said on Wednesday.

“When [his partner] saw him after his release, she didn’t see any such injuries to his face,” Ian Lloyd QC told the NSW Supreme Court bail hearing.

Mr Sotiropoulos, the 47-year-old brother of MacGill’s partner, has been in custody since May 5 and denies being involved in the abduction.

The incident allegedly arose after an associate of MacGill named “Sonny” used fake banknotes in a $660,000 transaction for two kilograms of cocaine, the court was told.

Mr Lloyd pointed to text messages in the Crown case between the former sportsman and a friend that were “consistent with my client having not been involved in the kidnapping in any shape or form”.

Mr MacGill texted a friend called “Jags” to “please” meet with Mr Sotiropoulos.

“He’ll fill you in. I’m in real deep s—. I can’t leave the phone unless they find me,” Mr MacGill said.

Further messages suggested Mr Sotiropoulos was “trying to assist as a middle man trying to sort out a dispute”, Mr Lloyd said.

But the Crown said Mr MacGill’s messages left a different impression: He was scared of his partner’s brother and was trying to get someone else to meet with him.

It appeared Mr Sotiropoulos had a trusted relationship and significant involvement with the drug hierarchy and had been offered $3000 for each kilogram brick he could help recover, prosecutor Anthony Brookman said.

While the Brighton Le Sands man appeared to take no part in the actual kidnapping, he’d caused a meeting with Mr MacGill and then introduced him to the alleged kidnappers.

“That’s a joint criminal enterprise,” the prosecutor said, dismissing suggestions the kidnapping case against Mr Sotiropoulos was weak.

Mr Sotiropoulos was an unacceptable risk of him fleeing, interfering with witnesses or committing serious offences, Mr Brookman said.

Mr Lloyd disputed that assessment, submitting the likely 18-month wait for a trial could exceed the non-parole period Mr Sotiropoulos would receive if convicted for his “minor” role in the drug supply.

Lockdowns in prison amid a COVID-19 outbreak also made preparing for a month-long trial onerous.

Justice Richard Cavanagh agreed with the Crown on the risks of release but said they could be mitigated with strict conditions.

That included house arrest except for a few circumstances when he must be with one of his parents, and a ban on crossing the Harbour Bridge or contacting Mr MacGill.

The alleged orchestrator of the kidnapping – Son Minh Nguyen, 42 – was granted bail in August after a judge accepted the Crown case against him was not particularly strong.

Mr Nguyen denies prior knowledge of the kidnapping, pointing to evidence suggesting he told Mr MacGill to find “$90,000 by lunchtime tomorrow”, only for abduction to occur that night.


Stay informed, daily
A FREE subscription to The New Daily arrives every morning and evening.
The New Daily is a trusted source of national news and information and is provided free for all Australians. Read our editorial charter.
Copyright © 2024 The New Daily.
All rights reserved.