A Chinese foreign ministry spokesman has shed new light on his countryâs rapidly deteriorating relations with Australia, pointing to two decisions that hastened the hostility.
Australiaâs relationship with China hit a new low on Wednesday as Canberra took its case against Beijingâs trade sanctions to the World Trade Organisation.
Trade Minister Simon Birmingham confirmed the government would escalate a dispute over Chinese tariffs on Australian barley to the WTO.
Beijing had slapped 80 per cent duties on Australian barley imports earlier this year, accusing producers of dumping undervalued product into the Chinese market â a claim Canberra vehemently denies.
âThis is the logical and appropriate next step for Australia to take,â Senator Birmingham said, adding that the government felt âhighly confidentâ there was âan incredibly strong caseâ to fight the dumping allegations.
China, in return, has pointed an accusatory finger at the Morrison governmentâs actions in blocking billions in Chinese business deals, claiming Australia has breached a free trade agreement between the two nations by rejecting foreign investment.
âIt has gone so far down the wrong path,â Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said on Wednesday.
Two major deals
Mr Wang said that the hostility can be traced back to the federal government blocking âdozensâ of Chinese companies from investing in Australia.
But he singled out two major business deals in particular â a proposed takeover of gas pipeline company APA Group by Hong Kongâs CK Infrastructure in 2018, and Mengniu Dairyâs proposed takeover of Lion Dairy earlier this year.
Neither deal was opposed by Australiaâs Foreign Investment Review Board, which oversees proposed foreign takeover bids, but both were eventually blocked by Treasurer Josh Frydenberg citing national security and national interest concerns in both cases.
âRecently weâve seen many reports in which Australia dresses up as a victim, pointing an accusing finger at China,â Mr Wang said, according to a government transcript.
âIn fact, it is the Australian side that has been politicising economic, investment and technological issues, and discriminating against Chinese companies.â

Simon Birmingham says Australia is taking China to the WTO over barley. Photo: AAP
The government is considering escalating other disputes with China over Australian wine and coal exports to the WTO, but Senator Birmingham expressed hope for a peaceful resolution to the stand-off instead.
âWe again instead extend the important offer of dialogue and discussion as an off-road, and offramp to this dispute,â he said.
Is China picking on Australia?
China has slapped trade bans and tariffs on multiple Australian products in recent months, including beef, timber, seafood, as well wine, coal and barley.
The simmering trade tensions are seen as diplomatic pressure or punishment over Australiaâs calls for an independent inquiry into the origins of coronavirus, crackdowns on foreign interference, criticisms of Chinaâs human rights record on Hong Kong and Uighur Muslims, and blocking Chinese company Huawei from our 5G market.

Chinaâs Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin tied the trade dispute to Australia blocking Chinese investments. Photo: AAP
That the trade war comes just as China applies other political pressure to Australia, including releasing a list of 14 âgrievancesâ with the federal government, is not considered a coincidence by Canberra.
Senator Birmingham said the decisions appeared to be sanctions against Australia. The government claims China is unfairly âsingling outâ Australia for punishment.
But Beijing has hit back, claiming Australia fired the first salvo in the trade stoush by blocking a total of $14 billion in Chinese investment.
âHuge losses for Chinese companiesâ

The World Trade Organization will be asked to rule on the barley issue with China. Photo: Get
Mr Wang claimed âa dozen Chinese investment projects were turned down by the Australian sideâ in recent years, which had âcaused huge losses for the Chinese companiesâ.
He also complained of Australia launching anti-dumping investigations against China, and claimed Canberra needed to act with âmutual respect and in compliance with rulesâ.
âWhat is worrying for us is such moves as politicising and obstructing normal trade activities, interfering in othersâ internal affairs in defiance of basic norms governing international relations and even provoking confrontation,â Mr Wang said.
âWe hope that the Australian side will reflect upon its own conduct, match its words with deeds, and provide favourable conditions for bilateral practical cooperation in various fields, instead of the opposite.â
Mr Wang said he wasnât aware of the ban on Australian thermal coal, which had been reported by Chinese state media this week, but maintained Chinaâs actions were legal.
âRecent measures taken by the Chinese authorities on some imported products from Australia are in line with Chinaâs laws and regulations and international practices,â he said.
âThey are also responsible steps to safeguard the interests of domestic industries and consumers.â
What next for WTO dispute?
Senator Birmingham admitted the WTO investigation could take years â not helped by the crucial appellant process being bogged down in massive delays due to US President Donald Trump blocking new appointees to its appeals court.

Simon Birmingham said Australia has an âincredibly strong caseâ against China. Photo: AAP
The WTO also has the power only to allow aggrieved nations to install retaliatory tariffs of their own, a process TND understands the federal government does not want to pursue against China.
Senator Birmingham admitted the WTO process was ânot perfectâ and took âlonger than would be idealâ.
âThere is ⌠an appellate body of the WTO, which is currently in a state of dysfunction,â he said.
However, he said China, Australia and about 20 other countries had agreed on an âalternative approachâ while the WTOâs appellant court was not operating.
He hoped this would help speed up the process.









