Hotel inquiry fails to determine who decided on private security

Head of the inquiry Jennifer Coate. Photo: AAP
The final report from the inquiry into Victoriaâs botched hotel quarantine program has been unable to determine who commissioned the use of private security and has slammed the Andrews Government for failing to do âproper analysisâ of the plan.
The COVID-19 Hotel Quarantine Inquiry report, which was tabled to Parliament on Monday morning, found no request was made to Victoria Police to provide the âfirst tierâ enforcement of hotel quarantine.
However, the chief commissioner of police at the time, Graham Ashton, was consulted and âexpressed a preference that private security perform that role and Victoria Police provide the âback upâ.â
- The full report is available here
Former judge Jennifer Coate said not one of the 70,000 documents before her inquiry âdemonstrated a contemporaneous rationale for the decision to use private security as the first tier of enforcement, or an approval of that rationale in the upper levels of governmentâ.
The report also found that decisions were made away from the Premier and senior ministers.
âThe decision as to the enforcement model for people detained in quarantine was a substantial part of an important public health initiative and it cost the Victorian community many millions of dollars,â the report said.
âBut it remained, as multiple submissions to the Inquiry noted, an orphan, with no person or department claiming responsibility.â
The report found that Victoriaâs second wave was triggered by transmission from hotel quarantine guests to staff and on into the community.
âConsideration was not given to the appropriateness or implications of using a largely casualised workforce in an environment where staff had a high likelihood of being exposed to the highly infectious COVID-19,â Ms Coate said in the report.
âThis, of course, had flow on impacts in terms of the spread of the virus.â

Premier Daniel Andrews apologised to all Victorians as he fronted the hotel quarantine inquiry.
Lack of planning on state and federal levels âmost unsatisfactory situationâ
The report said while both State and Federal Governments were aware prior to 2020 of the possibility of a pandemic, none of the existing national or Victorian pandemic plans contained mandatory, mass quarantine.
âIndeed, the concept of hotel quarantine was considered problematic and, thus, no plans for mandatory quarantine existed in the Commonwealthâs overarching plans for dealing with pandemic influenza,â the report said.
âThe lack of a plan for mandatory mass quarantine meant that Victoriaâs Hotel Quarantine Program was conceived and implemented âfrom scratchâ, to be operational within 36 hours, from concept to operation.
âThis placed extraordinary strain on the resources of the State, and, more specifically, on those departments and people required to give effect to the decision made in the National Cabinet and agreed to by the Premier on behalf of Victoria.
âThis lack of planning was a most unsatisfactory situation from which to develop such a complex and high-risk program.â
The report said while the inquiry did not have a remit to examine the actions of the Commonwealth, it would be âunfairâ to judge Victoriaâs lack of planning for a mandatory quarantine program, given the Commonwealth had neither recommended nor developed such a plan.
The program operated for three months from late March to late June, when it was shut down after genomic testing traced coronavirus infections in the community to infection control breaches in the state-run hotels.
During the time it operated, a total of 21,821 returned travellers went through the program, with a total of 236 (1.1 per cent) of those travellers testing positive for COVID-19 while in quarantine.
A rebooted program started earlier this month.
The inquiry held public hearings over 27 days, took evidence from 96 witnesses and received more than 350,000 pages of documents.
More to come.








