Senator Linda Reynolds says she sent confidential documents related to Brittany Higgins to a journalist because she believed the Attorney-General was “stitching” her up.

The former minister is suing Higgins for defamation over social media posts containing alleged mistruths that Reynolds claims have damaged her reputation.

She told a Perth court on Thursday that she sent three documents to a journalist from The Australian, Janet Albrechtsen, related to Higgins’ $2.4 million Commonwealth settlement.

“I picked her because she is the most balanced,” she said.

“There was no agreement or anything that she would be favourable to me in any way.”

Reynolds used her personal Gmail account to send the letters, which had been sent to her by her Commonwealth lawyer.

Asked by Higgins’ lawyer, Rachael Young, why she did it, Reynolds said she wanted Albrechtsen to know she had been denied the ability to counter Higgins’ claims that she’d mishandled her alleged rape.

“Claims that had expired. The statute of limitations had expired,” Reynolds said.

“I was incredibly angry because I could see the Attorney-General of this nation was stitching me up. So absolutely I did want her to know, and I wanted the public to know.”

Reynolds denied she chose Albrechtsen because she believed the journalist would be less favourable to Higgins in her reporting than others.

“I provided her with evidence of my claims of corruption and then it was up to her in how she reported it,” she said.

“I never saw the final claims against me, the statement of liability and I was not provided any opportunity to defend the claims.

“They didn’t allow me to defend myself … I could have still defended them had I been given the opportunity,” she said.

Reynolds denied she used her personal email account to send the documents to hide her actions from scrutiny.

She agreed with Young that she was pleased when she saw Albrechtsen’s article a few days later. But she denied her motivation for passing on the documents was to raise questions about Higgins’ Commonwealth settlement.

“It’s the other way around … It’s about the way the Commonwealth dealt with the claim,” she said.

“I had no issue with Ms Higgins in this process at all. I was very clear that this was about the Attorney-General and how he had, I believe, corruptly manipulated the law to muzzle me so my issue was never with Ms Higgins.”

Young also quizzed Reynolds about the distress Albrechtsen’s article could cause Higgins and her ongoing mental health issues.

“I had no indication of what the state of [Ms Higgins’] mental health was, and what was top of my mind was exposing what I believe to be corruption by the Attorney-General,” Reynolds said.

“And you didn’t seek to find out what the state of her mental health conditions was prior to you sending these three communications?” Young said.

“No,” Reynolds said.

Higgins’ defence relies on truth and that it was reasonable to comment on issues of public interest concerning government and political matters.

She alleges colleague Bruce Lehrmann raped her in Reynolds’ office in 2019. Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and his criminal trial was derailed by juror misconduct.

The trial continues.

-AAP